Our Sporting Heritage

  • Get Involved
  • BLOG
  • Contact
  • Your backcountry
  • Roadless?
  • Home
Home > BLOG > News > Got questions? We’ve got answers
  • News
  • SCP Fall Blog
  • Uncategorized
  • Summer blog series ad

    Through­out the sum­mer, the mem­bers of Trout Unlimited’s Sportsmen’s Con­ser­va­tion Project will be fea­tur­ing a series of blogs. For more infor­ma­tion about Trout Unlim­ited or to become a mem­ber, go to tu.org



Got ques­tions? We’ve got answers

Q: What is road­less back­coun­try land?

A: First, the term road­less is a mis­nomer. Many stretches of road­less habi­tat on U.S. For­est Ser­vice have roads inside their bound­aries. Oth­ers are bounded by paved roads and high­ways. Many road­less areas are actu­ally eli­gi­ble for new road con­struc­tion. In gen­eral, how­ever, road­less land is untracked, untrashed pub­lic land that offers stel­lar fish and game habi­tat and unpar­al­leled hunt­ing and fish­ing opportunity.

Q: What uses are allowed in the road­less backcountry?

A: Most any use that is allowed on front-country pub­lic land is gen­er­ally allowed in road­less areas. Motor­ized access is allowed on des­ig­nated trails, and hunt­ing and fish­ing are allowed. Camp­ing, hik­ing, wood-cutting, climb­ing, geo­caching, cycling … all are allowed in road­less areas using trails des­ig­nated for par­tic­u­lar activities.

Q: Why is the road­less back­coun­try impor­tant to sportsmen?

A: Easy. Road­less land offers the best habi­tat. Habi­tat trans­lates directly into oppor­tu­nity. The biggest bulls and bucks are har­vested each year from road­less hunt­ing units; the health­i­est pop­u­la­tions of wild and native fish swim in waters that begin or flow through road­less areas. Sim­ply put, sport­ing oppor­tu­nity in the back­coun­try is unpar­al­leled, and avail­able to everyone.

Q: Would the Wilder­ness and Road­less Area Release Act actu­ally allow for devel­op­ment of road­less areas all over the country?

A: For the most part, yes. Some states, like Idaho, have road­less land man­age­ment rules in place and would not be impacted by this bill. This bill is an attempt by Con­gress to cir­cum­vent an inclu­sive pub­lic process. Keep in mind, the 2001 Road­less Rule was imple­mented only after an exhaus­tive pub­lic input process–about 70 per­cent of the com­ments received dur­ing that process favored the pro­tec­tion of our country’s road­less backcountry.

Q: Why is keep­ing the road­less back­coun­try just like it is now impor­tant for hunters and anglers?

A: The rea­son hunt­ing suc­cess in the back­coun­try is so much bet­ter than it is else­where is because of the backcountry’s intact habi­tat. This habi­tat is unmarred and largely left alone–game ani­mals and wild fish are more plen­ti­ful. Addi­tion­ally, these areas boast the longest hunt­ing sea­sons, which gives sports­men an oppor­tu­nity to be more selec­tive, and spend more time afield. Again, habi­tat and oppor­tu­nity go hand in hand.

Q: Does this bill allow local peo­ple to have some input into how their pub­lic lands are managed?

A: No. In fact, this bill does just the oppo­site. For instance, the bill would release most of the country’s wilder­ness study areas with­out the ben­e­fit of local input. Granted, not all WSAs are wor­thy of wilder­ness des­ig­na­tion, but shouldn’t that deci­sion involve local stakeholders?

Q: Won’t this bill help the local economies by allow­ing indus­try access to the backcountry?

A: First, new roads, no mat­ter who pays for them, will require main­te­nance. Our country’s cur­rent fis­cal cri­sis doesn’t pro­vide enough money to even approach the fund­ing needed to main­tain the exist­ing road net­works on U.S. For­est Ser­vice and Bureau of Land Man­age­ment prop­erty. Sec­ond, rural com­mu­ni­ties depend heav­ily on hunt­ing and fish­ing for long-term, renew­able eco­nomic growth. Hin­der­ing hunt­ing and angling by allow­ing short– term indus­trial activ­ity on land belong­ing to every Amer­i­can is unwise. Finally, only a small por­tion of our pub­lic lands qual­ify as road­less back­coun­try. The bulk of our pub­lic lands are open to indus­trial devel­op­ment and motor­ized use. Com­merce and recre­ation would not be hin­dered by keep­ing the exist­ing bal­ance in place.

Q: Will states be allowed to decide which road­less areas will be released under this bill?

A: No. The bill would release 43 mil­lion acres of pro­tected habi­tat and pave the way for sig­nif­i­cant new development.

Q: How can I get involved and help pro­tect hunt­ing and fish­ing access to the backcountry?

A: Write your state’s fed­eral del­e­ga­tion, and if you’re not sure who to con­tact, visit house.gov, and enter your ZIP code in the “find your rep­re­sen­ta­tive” sec­tion. Tell them that sup­port­ing this bill amounts to a will­ing degra­da­tion of the last, best places to fish and hunt in the United States. Tell them hunters and anglers have per­haps the most inti­mate con­nec­tion with our pub­lic lands and that a top-down approach to man­ag­ing them takes the power out of the hands of local cit­i­zens and local economies. Tell Con­gress to pro­tect the bal­ance that exists today on America’s pub­lic lands.




Site by WH21 | Contact Us© Copyright 2012 Trout Unlimited